A clearer view of your writing
Review your writing for signs of AI-generated text.
Check your draft, explore flagged passages, and decide where a closer review would help.
Your results will appear here. See your writing assessment and passages to review after running a check.
Feedback you can use
Use automated feedback alongside your judgment to examine wording and strengthen explanations.
Look at highlighted text in context. Decide whether each passage explains your point clearly and includes enough detail.
A flagged passage is a reason to investigate. An automated estimate cannot prove who or what wrote it.
Check evidence, sharpen explanations, and replace vague claims with specific observations.
Simple from the first draft
Three steps to a more informed writing review.
Add the passage you want to examine. Include enough context to make the feedback useful.
Run the check to see the assessment and identify passages that deserve attention.
Compare the feedback with your notes and sources. Edit where it improves clarity and meaning.
Independent writing review
T-Checker offers a preliminary review before you submit a draft. Examine the feedback and identify questions to resolve before handing in your work.
Automated results are estimates and should be evaluated alongside the text and its context.
T-Checker highlights writing signals and passages that may benefit from closer review.
Verify your argument, attribute quotations, and follow your assignment’s rules for AI assistance.
Built around your draft
Make a thoughtful review part of your writing process.
Review broad claims and find places where examples or evidence would strengthen your argument.
Read feedback alongside your notes. Verify summaries, citations, and the distinction between sources and your own analysis.
Check whether each section answers the task and contributes something specific to the discussion.
Identify passages for discussion. Consider writing history, sources, and the author’s explanation alongside automated results.
Read results in context
An automated assessment offers one perspective on a text. It cannot establish authorship or certify academic integrity.
Review flagged material and consider how it was written. Formulaic language and editing can influence results.
Continue checking accuracy, attribution, and the permitted use of writing assistance.
Human writing may be flagged, and generated text may be missed. Use results as part of a broader review.
Writing-pattern analysis
The AI checker evaluates combinations of linguistic signals across your text. No single pattern proves AI use, and ordinary human writing can contain the same characteristics.
Repeated sentence shapes and highly uniform phrasing can make a passage appear more mechanically constructed.
Recurring transitions, stock expressions, and repeated vocabulary may contribute to an AI-writing signal.
Polished but nonspecific claims can lack the concrete evidence, perspective, or detail expected in original academic writing.
Generated passages may maintain unusually consistent sentence length, cadence, and tone across multiple paragraphs.
Broad explanations without examples, source-based detail, or discipline-specific reasoning may deserve closer review.
The detector assesses signals together across the passage. Results can change with text length, editing, genre, and writing style.
AI writing tools
Check text created or assisted by popular AI writing tools. The detector can identify writing signals, but it cannot reliably determine which specific model produced a passage.
How people use T-Checker
Writers and reviewers use the AI score and sentence highlights to focus their attention before a deeper manual review.
“The sentence-level view helps me identify passages that deserve a conversation. I still review sources and draft history, but the report gives me a practical place to begin.”
“I find the highlights more useful than a score alone. They let me discuss specific wording with students and ask how an idea or paragraph developed.”
“I checked an essay before submission and found a few generic paragraphs. Revisiting those sections helped me add examples that were actually connected to my argument.”
“The paper checker was easy to use and made it clear where to look. I compared each flagged section with my notes before deciding whether it needed revision.”
“T-Checker gives me a quick second opinion on repetitive or formulaic wording. I appreciate that the report points to individual sentences instead of stopping at a percentage.”
“There is no lengthy setup: I paste the draft, run the AI check, and review the marked lines. It fits easily into my final proofreading routine.”
Your questions, answered
Common questions about reviewing AI-writing signals with T-Checker.
T-Checker evaluates combinations of linguistic patterns and highlights passages for closer review. Its result is an estimate, not proof of authorship.
Yes. Use the free check available on this page. Any applicable usage limits should be shown with the tool.
Yes. False positives are possible. Consider drafts, research notes, sources, and writing history when reviewing a result.
No. AI detection estimates whether a text shows characteristics associated with generated writing. Plagiarism checking examines overlap with sources.
You can submit that text, but the result cannot reliably identify which tool produced it.
Review the passages, verify evidence, and strengthen your reasoning. Follow any disclosure requirements for AI assistance.
Examine your text, consider the feedback, and revise with purpose.